Month: June, 2010

Guest Blog by Malcolm Thomson: Writing, reading, publishing, …

Ian Roberts Guest Blog titled The Difficulties Of Becoming Published made grim reading.

Not that he fails to quote some words of encouragement…

“Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not: nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not: unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not: the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone can assure success. Press on!”.

But I wonder in what direction we should press on?

Could it be that we lovers of words-on-paper must find the courage to come out of our comfort zones and ask some questions… about publishing… and about storytelling.

Roberts invites us implicitly to do so. He points out that these big [publishing] organisations have many established writers on their books and do not need to rely on fresh talent or first-time authors.”

How true. And it is not entirely a bad thing. As a reader of on average two trade paperbacks per week I am happy that there are the established writers I can count on to craft a good yarn. Many of these are authors who have developed a franchise over the years, with their series of novels becoming almost a form of episodic entertainment, cleverly promoted as such. I do look forward to ‘the next Ian Rankin’ or a new title from Kate Mosse, Lee Child or Diana (we all have our weaknesses) Gabaldon.

None of the big publishing houses are waiting for Ian’s manuscript or mine! In the United Kingdom over fifty percent of revenues are generated by just five concerns: Harper Collins, Pan Macmillan, Penguin, Hachette and Random House. They are satisfying both their shareholders and their readers.

So the answer to the question about the publishers might well be… let them be! In many ways they have enough on their plates, given their need to adapt to the world of e-Readers and iPad apps.

The other question which could be posed concerns our understanding of storytelling.

Under the heading Publish For What Reason? Johanna Denize reminded us on this blog that change is slow, especially when it comes to an existing giant of an industry that has been run the same way basically since Gutenberg came along.”

But it could be argued that the Internet and a range of digital tools now provide a totally new toolset, in itself as revolutionary as Gutenberg’s press was in its time and as likely to bring about as radical and irreversible change as the advent of printing did. The scriptoria emptied! My comment to the blog post was as follows…

I am wondering whether we are overlooking one of the most significant points with regard to narrative fiction and electronic interface devices. What I spy on the horizon is a move towards transmediality. I look forward to storytelling as compelling as any successful novel, but delivered not just as written prose, but in multiple forms on multiple platforms.”

I made a tentative step in this direction about four years ago. I had thirty-nine chapters of a manuscript and the vague notion that a website-based hybrid form of self-publishing was… thinkable. Sex&Drugs&Profiteroles The idea was to release a chapter per week as an audio podcast hosted on what seemed at the time to be the most promising platform. The first thirteen chapters were to be free, but a one-time payment would be asked for from those wishing to carry on to the end.

Each audio chapter, however, was preceded by a short video clip, a vlog in which the novel’s heroine looks back on the events that the story relates.

Each weekly clip then closes with a call to action inciting the user to click through to the audio. The additional effort involved was far from onerous nor was it particularly demanding in terms of video skills which, in this day and age, are no longer exotic or unduly challenging. Basic editing is now possible on the latest iPhone.

In the case of my own project we didn’t get further than Chapter Seven. But this was not on account of any basic flaw in the operational model. There was a hiccup when a particular software suite, permitting videoblogging with virtual green-screen backgrounds, was suddenly withdrawn from the market when Adobe bought the company. When the product (Visual Communicator, US$ 399) was re-launched it was too late for us.

The main problem at the time was that I was working in Abu Dhabi and my ‘heroine’ was at university in England; our only direct collaboration was for the sixth and seventh chapters which were coveniently locationed in Dubai. And our realization was that a venture of this nature is totally not made easier when thousands of kilometres lie between the participating creatives.

I remain convinced that the video component enhanced the potential discoverability of Sex&Drugs&Profiteroles. And in 2006 YouTube was by no means as powerful a force as it is today. A story that is difficult to find is a story which will never be read; this being a problem that few of the self-publishing enablers have adequately solved.

Today the transmediality can go further than video. An interactive game, features akin to the ‘bonus content’ we know from DVDs, social network community involvement, virtual presence in a metaverse like SecondLife

Ian Roberts recalls a writing course which “taught me to ‘throw away’ every word that was not essential and to focus on the story and the characters, not my self-indulgent descriptions and unnecessary narrative.” Many writers follow this brutal and soulless rule and even get their work published. My feeling is that their readers are the kind who mistake Fox News for journalism!

At the risk of provoking I would suggest that Ian’s self-indulgent descriptions and unnecessary narrative constitute, for a sophisticated audience open to the enrichment of a Gesamtkunstwerk, exactly the kind of resource which can be further developed as cross-platform extensions of storytelling. The motion picture Artificial Intelligence and the television series Alias and, more recently, Lost show the way. In these cases the total entertainment experience went far beyond the flickering imagery on the screen with immersive websites which attracted the active engagement of a participating audience.

None of the platform extensions a novelist might be tempted (I hope) to try imply any huge hardware or software investment, none demand skills which cannot be quickly learned. And all of these and more can move storytelling from mere words-on-paper to a new level, and one on which the independents and newcomers are probably better positioned than the publishing behemoths of old.

The thinking behind the trend in the direction of transmediality is far better expressed by others far more qualified than I. Might I recommend particularly Henry Jenkins, Provost’s Professor of Communication, Journalism, and Cinematic Arts at the University of Southern California. In Convergence Culture Jenkins cites the Matrix as an example of transmedia storytelling. Jenkins explains that key bits of information are conveyed through three live action films, a series of animated shorts, two collections of comic book stories, and several video games. There is no one single source or ur-text where one can turn to gain all of the information needed to comprehend the Matrix universe.”

A Wiki page lists further links which will prove useful to those wishing to dip a toe into these fascinating waters.

Slush Pile Reader is, of course, for storytellers who are first and foremost writers. But as we authors, chastened as we must be by Ian Roberts’ well-intentioned

reflections, look ahead and realize that the chances of our tale being published between hard covers is truly remote, I think that the consideration of alternatives is probably a damn good idea.

Malcolm James Thomson is the author of Golden Dawn and blogs from, of all the interesting places out there,  Abu Dhabi, on Sandlander.

If you too want to be a guest blogger – send us a message: johanna@slushpilereader.com

Guest blog by L. Anne Carrington: Why do we write?

Why do we write? Is there a story that needs to be told, but yet not put down on paper? Do some of us aim to produce the next Great American Novel? Maybe we have a message that writing is an effective way to reach large groups of people, or perhaps it’s our own form of therapy (why do you think some psychotherapists encourage their patients to journal on a regular basis?)

Some love to write for fun, yet get paid at the same time, others only write one book just to say they’ve done it (maybe as part of a lifetime goal), and then there’s a handful of people who write for the sole purpose of earning income—they despise writing in general.

There’s a book in our heads waiting to be written, characters brought to life and shared with the world. Like painting, sketching, and sculpture, writing’s an art that creates a story with words rather than pencil, charcoal, paint, or clay.

When we’ve completed a book or story, a feeling of accomplishment and elation often felt, especially if months—and in many cases, years— were invested in writing, editing, and developing a book previously stored in our subconscious before coming to life, whether on pages or electronic readers.

There are authors exploring new subjects not previously tapped, others jumping on the latest trend, and yet more trying something original on their own. All the aforementioned may be instant hits or may fail on the market (given if the works get published), but one isn’t a writer if risks aren’t taken once in awhile.

Writing can be a hobby, a job, or something else altogether. During my early years, I wasn’t a person who could communicate feelings and thoughts well in the verbal sense, but hand me a notebook and pen (followed in later years by a typewriter, and then a PC with a word processing program), and I could express myself without thinking. At the age of eighteen, while I worked on my high school’s newspaper, I became enamored with writing on the journalistic level, and was the first staff member to be published in a major paper after, on a whim, I submitted a music review to one of the city’s newspapers.

Encouraged, I began producing other written work over the next several years, many published in both print and various websites, working my way up to The Wrestling Babe internet column in 2003, and a two-year stint as a music reviewer for Indie Music Stop. In between, I did “fun” writing, such as fan fiction, as a stress reliever, and in July 2008, I decided to push the envelope further by starting my first full-length novel, The Cruiserweight.

Like any other vocation or interest in the world, writing has its down side. We experience things such as writer’s block, rejection letters, naysayers who say that we can’t do it and are wasting our time, endless hours of editing, thinking of new ways to come up with marketing our works, and finding honest, yet constructive, critiques.

Still, we continue to write…but why? Because we can, and despite the drawbacks of our hobby (or vocation, whatever the case), we enjoy the challenges and the creative aspects writing brings, and the feelings of fulfillment and elation once a project’s completed and in print makes the entire journey of being a writer worthwhile…then we start all over again.

–L. Anne Carrington

L. Anne Carrington is the author of The Cruiserweight cc she also has her own excellent blog.

Guest Blog by Ian Roberts: The Difficulties of Becoming Published

A long time ago, I wrote a novel. It took me a year to write it, and I then sent it off expecting a quick reply, a fat cheque and early retirement. What I got instead was a stream of rejection slips, other than two letters, which showed interest and offered encouragement. One was from an agent, who showed great interest, the other from the fiction editor of a large publisher, which has now been swallowed up by a multinational conglomerate. I was invited to rewrite the novel, making specified changes, and resubmit it. I did this. It took me another year, in between renovating a house, teaching English, playing rugby and getting married. I sent off the rewritten version, expecting more speedy replies and an even fatter check. Instead, after quite some time, I received two polite letters. The first one informed me that the agent had died a month earlier and that the agency was dealing with her affairs and unable to take on new clients. The second letter told me that the editor in question had left publishing. I was just a little disappointed and said things such as ‘Oh gosh’ and ‘Dearie me’, as I flung the unread, returned typescripts across the room. I then rushed out of the house and assaulted a man who happened to be walking his dog. For good measure, I kicked the dog too. Ten years later, in between playing rugby, renovating another house, being married, teaching and becoming a father, I rewrote the book, again with no success. Sadly, I couldn’t find an old man or a dog to assault, so I shot the neighbour’s cat instead.

This book would not let go of me, so I decided to have another go, this time with a difference. To try and make a little extra money, I had tried my hand at short stories, after trying a writing course. I won’t go into all the details, but the course taught me to ‘throw away’ every word that was not essential and to focus on the story and the characters, not my self-indulgent descriptions and unnecessary narrative. As a result, my novel was completed at half the original length. It was self-published (paid for by a friend, who had faith in it), in 2006, and sold quite well with family and friends (I made the huge amount of approx £200.00). I have also had five short stories accepted for publication. So, there you go: to get this far, it has taken a couple of decades (on and off), a badly-beaten man and his dog and a dead cat. I thought I would tell you this just to cheer you up and fill you with optimism from the outset.

The first thing you should know is that becoming published is extremely difficult. And that is an understatement, even for those who are talented enough and have a potential best seller to offer. If you are not prepared for a very long ride and to accept one rejection after another, forget the idea. You might become one of the lucky few and quickly find a publisher or agent to take you on. But, for most aspiring writers, it is a very long and rocky road. Becoming published demands talent, accepting good advice, working on the craft of story-telling, a lot of patience, hard work and determination. It also demands a willingness to accept the letters of rejection time and again then pick yourself up and start all over. It’s not easy. Consider this. You have put in a great deal of work. You have slaved over your typescript and you believe it is going to happen for you. You really believe that your hopes and dreams will soon be a reality. You have sweated over that typescript for months or years. You believe in it. You ache to be recognised as a writer. You think it is a worthy piece of writing. Then, the postman delivers that first rejection letter, and many more follow. You receive one letter after another telling you that your work is not wanted or good enough. It is heart breaking, a terrible feeling of disbelief and hurt. How can they say that you ask. I’ve worked so hard. They can’t do this to me. And the rejection letters rarely offer worthwhile encouragement or advice. I have been there, and it hurts. It knocks the wind from your sails, and you really have to want writing success to face these slings and arrows and keep on going. If you think you might not be able to face that then forget about being published right now. Have I cheered you up even more or do you feel like shooting a cat?

There are too many examples to quote of successful authors who were initially rejected by numerous publishers and agents. There are thousands of them. You may be aware of James Patterson, currently a very popular author of a string of best crime and mystery novels, several of which have been made into films. His first book, The Thomas Berryman Number, was rejected twenty-four times before being published, but it went on to win the prestigious Edgar Award for a first mystery novel. Another author, John Kennedy Toole, provides a very poignant, example. Toole killed himself in 1969, because he could not get his book published. His mother persisted with the typescript, which was eventually published as A Confederacy of Dunces, a wonderful book, which subsequently won the Pulitzer Prize and was translated into ten languages. I imagine few people have not heard of a certain JK Rowling. Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone was not her first novel. She had written and put aside two novels before beginning the Harry Potter series. The Philosopher’s Stone itself took years to write and was rejected numerous times before publication. These are just a few examples, and I will provide some more, later. There are many successful authors, past and present, who have had frequent experience of rejection. The keyword is ‘perseverance’: if you are good enough and want it enough, you may succeed, but it is not easy. Or, hard as it may be to accept, you may not have what it takes and must face that reality. But if you are good enough and want it enough and persevere you could get there.

On Persistence: “Nothing in the world can take the place of Persistence. Talent will not: nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not: unrewarded Genius is almost a proverb. Education will not: the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone can assure success. Press on!”

(Anonymous)

Publishers and authors’ agents receive hundreds of typescripts or manuscripts each week and are inundated with work from unknown writers as well as work from established authors or writing that has been specially commissioned. The competition is very fierce, and even established authors can be rejected. An editorial assistant or professional ‘reader’ may determine how far your work gets, and it may depend on personal preference or simply a whim. Even if your work reaches the desk of an editor who thinks you have potential, it may not be his decision to accept or reject your work. You may have produced writing of merit, brilliance, even, but that does not guarantee publication. In days gone by, publishing houses might well accept work of merit and publish it for little or no profit, in the knowledge that the work was good and may possibly lead to bigger things. However, the days of ‘gentleman publishing’ are gone, and accountants now rule the roost. Many of the old publishing houses have disappeared, replaced by conglomerates and multinationals whose sole motivation is profit. These big organisations have many established writers on their books and do not need to rely on fresh talent or first-time authors. The criteria for publication are ‘will it sell and to whom and how many copies’. It does not matter if you have talent or potential worth nurturing. If you can not turn an immediate profit you will probably face rejection, unless you are lucky, for luck as well as talent and perseverance play a big part in becoming published unless, of course, you ‘know’ someone, and even then there are no guarantees. It is, in a way, comparable to The X-Factor, on TV. There are thousands of applicants, a great deal of talent on display, more than a few sad people with little self-knowledge or ability, many broken hearts and only a small number who actually make it. Such is life, but remember that every winner of the Booker Prize, Pulitzer Prize or even Nobel Prize was once an unpublished writer. Writers write and keep on going. So, do you still want to be a writer?

Dealing with rejection: remember that both past and currently successful authors, many of them now household names, once faced rejection. John Braine, one of the literary ‘names’ of the last century, had Room at the Top rejected thirty-eight times. It is now regarded as a classic of that genre. Jack Higgins, who wrote The Eagle Has Landed and a stream of best sellers, struggled for years to become published. Wilbur Smith, Stephen King, even Charles Dickens: the list is endless, and rejection is the norm, not the exception. A rather scary piece of information is that there are probably more writers than readers out there.

However, although a rejection letter or slip will hurt you, it is not the end unless you allow it to be. Think back to the earlier examples of rejected writers who achieved success and fame. Here are some more: “You’re welcome to Le Carre. He hasn’t got any future.” This was said about John Le Carre’s book The Spy Who Came In From the Cold. I wonder how many million books John Le Carre has now sold. “A long, dull novel about an artist.” This was a comment on Irving Stone’s biographical novel of the life of Van Gogh, which sold a million and was made into a film. So, it’s not all gloom and doom, but keep that word ‘perseverance’ firmly in your head and accept that you are most probably in for a long haul if you really want to be a successful and paid writer. No one ever achieved writing success by throwing away a typescript when rejected and angry and bitter and hurt by a publisher’s adverse reaction. Keep your typescript, shoot a cat then start again. Mao Tse Tung, the father of modern China, said: “A thousand-mile journey begins with the first step…” And most aspiring writers face that metaphorical ‘thousand-mile’ journey. You have to start somewhere, but it will probably be a long walk, so be prepared or pack it in, now.

Publishers and agents will, for the most part, if rejecting you, provide a polite letter in a standardised format. They do not exist to edit or criticise your work and will refuse to do so. They are very busy with those whose work has been accepted. However, if you are lucky enough to receive a reply with more than a brief, perfunctory comment you are honoured, as publishers do not waste time with those whose work shows no merit at all. If this happens to you, despite the rejection, be encouraged, but if you receive a stream of offhand rejections you might consider whether your work is worth the effort or that writing is not for you at all. So, do you still want to be a writer?

The rewards of writing: I’m sure there are many people who would and will continue to write for no material reward, but wouldn’t it be wonderful to get paid huge amounts for a labour of love? But, I’m afraid there is more bad news for you. For most, the financial rewards are few. I’ll bet you’re glad you’re reading this, aren’t you? We sometimes read of astronomic sums paid to novelists, the sale of film rights and writers who become tax exiles. It is no wonder some people think writing is an easy way to become rich. In reality, the average author’s earnings are very small. Few can afford to make it a full time career unless they have other means of financial support. Even one successful book does not guarantee a second, and earnings may vary from year to year. You would probably need a string of best sellers to guarantee automatic acceptance of your next book or a large and steady income from writing novels. Or, you could become a glamour model, with an expensive boob job, display your goods to all and sundry in the tabloids and, after a short career of boob displays, write an utterly fascinating biography of life as a ‘celebrity’.

So, you write your novel and are fortunate enough to find a publisher. What can you expect to earn? Well, there is no hard and fast answer. Perhaps you might make that fortune or maybe you will hardly cover your expenses. You may receive an advance from your publisher, but the amount will depend on the number of future sales your publisher envisages. The greater the sales potential of your book, the larger the advance you will be paid. If sales of your book produce an amount exceeding the advance, you will then receive royalties as well, according to the contract previously negotiated. For example, if your book costs £15.00, you will have to sell one thousand copies at a royalty of 10% to earn £1,500.00, and there is no guarantee you will sell that many. Perhaps you might then receive upwards of £1000.00 for the paperback rights. This will be shared with your hardback publisher, in keeping with your contract. Foreign translation rights and public lending rights (libraries, etc) could increase the amount your book earns, as could the foreign rights, if sold. Multiply this by ten and you might have made £30,000.00 but may take several years to achieve this. And you must balance this against all the time and sweat and hopes ploughed into your book.

My own view is that it’s not about money (I won’t refuse any donations, however): it’s about the love of words and language; it’s about the excitement of creating; it’s about the freedom and fun of being able to do what the hell you want to, with characters and situations, people and places – it’s about writing.

Do you still want to be a writer? I do.

Ian Roberts loves rugby, reading and writing, as well as wine, music and film. He’s a smallholder who lives in North Wales and the author of ‘Catch the Sun‘ on Slush Pile Reader.

If you too want to be a guest blogger – send us a message: johanna@slushpilereader.com