Guest blog by Louise Wise & an hilarious take on agent proposals

I started writing long before the Internet, and before you think I’m an old codger the ‘net has only been around fifteen odd years! If writing is a lonely occupation now, back then there were no forums where I could discuss my word count, or grumble about slow-to-reply agents. There was nothing, and I was stumbling about with my little Amstrad computer (good old Alan Sugar), writing novels with the word count something in the region of 300,000.

I’m glad to say my word count is under control now, and when the Internet arrived it was easier to find information on my chosen profession. And with Facebook and Twitter agents and publishers were no longer faceless, and there were other writers like me!

Indie presses, eBooks, and POD soon followed and the writing forum I was a member of offered to POD Eden. I had previously found an agent for Eden, but because of its originality the agent failed to place it with a publishing house, and so instead I thought I’d experiment with POD. It meant I’d have to do all my own marketing, and a few years ago this would have frightened me ridged, but honestly it’s been great. The entire process has been a learning curve.

I started blogging for the first time in 2008 on the launch of Eden, and looked for ways to get myself “seen”. I wrote articles, short stories for magazines and offered an editing service on my blog. Word soon got round and people began to contact me for support/articles.

I now offer to feature new writers and their books on my blog. It works both ways. I get my name “out there” and writers can use my audience to their advantage.

I am still open to submissions. Send me a short bio, blurb of your book, include links to blog/website that you want published and I’ll get back to you. Sometimes I will send out questions, this just gives a bit of variety to my posts. I am trying to do two features a week and it will help me enormously if you send things via email rather than attachment.

Blog: http://louisewise.blogspot.com/

Email: louisewise3@ntlworld.com

Eden on Amazon.co.ukhttp://amzn.to/c2Lh45 or Amazon.com:http://amzn.to/9lowsQ

Louise Wise: Proposals by Email

Dear Agent,
Please find attached my idea for a novel called: Twinned. It’s in PDF because I don’t want you to steal my idea!!! :(
My mum says it’s brilliant! It is a thriller about a woman who falls for a man who has a twin who is a wanted man. To spice things up the woman also discovers she is a twin (separated at birth), and the sister traces her and falls in love with the criminal twin!!!!
Let me know what you think,
Regards, Sarah

Dear Agent,
Just to let you know I’ve thought of a sequel to Twinned. It’s about the twins marrying one another and going on a life of crime with their twin children. View the attached and let me know what you think ASAP.
Regards, Sarah

Dear Agent,
Forgot to add, the sequel is called Twinned Again.
Sarah.

Dear Agent,
I’m concerned you haven’t contacted me about my ideas for Twinned and Twinned Again that I emailed the other day. I’m sure you can’t be that busy that you can’t press the reply button!!!
Regards, Sarah

Dear Agent,
Why haven’t you replied? It’s very rude. Mum thinks it’s a conspiracy or new authorism or something. Is it?
Regards, Sarah

Dear Agey,
I am getting very worried now. Maybe you haven’t received my novel and it went into spam? I know this can happen because it happens a lot to me :( . Please check your spam box. BTW I’ve changed the genre to romance.
Sarah

Dear Age,
Just in case you have lost Twinned and Twinned Again here is another attachment :D !!!!
The opening is a little slow because I have to introduce two sets of twins and their twin off-spring (the criminal twin and his wife have triplets!!!!), but on page ten it’s really good!! Oh, I’ve made the characters older so the children have more to do in the story. Mum thinks it’ll defo be a bestseller now!!!
Best, Sarah

A,
The genre is now a YA. Think I’ll focus on the kids of the story rather than the parents.
Sar.
Yo!
Just to let you know my friends on facebook said they will buy my book once you publish it. Can you tell me when that will be please?
S xx

Hi A,
I’ve wrote the second chapter now and have sent that as attached. It’s copywrited so don’t get any ideas!!!!! This chapter focuses on the triplets. They have taken on their dad’s life of crime, so this one is more thriller than romance. Not sure how it will pan out tbh. ;) Will you get back to me this week? I really, really REALLY need to know what you think before I continue further.
Sxxxxxxxx

A,
Have you replied? If you have I haven’t received it. Can you forward your reply again?
Thanks
S

A,
Disregard the previous email and chapter two. The triplets Jan, Fran and Ann are now boys called Jack, Zach and Mac!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Love Sar xx.

AGENT
NOT HEARD FROM YOU AS YET!!!! STILL WAITING!!!
SARAH

Dear Mr Agent,
I am thinking about reporting you. This wait (four days and five hours) is outrageous. May I remain you that if it wasn’t for writers like me you’d be out of a job!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sarah Higgenbottom

Agent,
You aren’t going to reply are you? :( :(
People are SO rude!!!!!!!!!!!! I am taking my novel ideas to another agency. This is YOUR loss.
Goodbye
Ms Higgenbottom

Guest Blogger L. Anne Carrington: “Just write!”

Famed author Anne Rice once gave this advice to new writers: “There are no rules in this profession. Do what is good for you. Read books and watch films that stimulate your writing. In your writing, go where the pain is; go where the pleasure is; go where the excitement is. Believe in your own original approach, voice, characters, story. Ignore critics. Have nerve. Be stubborn.”

In most cases, these words couldn’t ring more true. A few writer colleagues discussed their ideas of developing their respective novels with me, and confused by the conflicted feedback she’d received on her manuscript, one had shelved her own project for some time  She’s once again dusting off the respective manuscript, encouraged by telling her story first, and  working on the editing details later. “Just write,” I told her.

We all read the books, the blogs, attend the conferences, frequent the message boards and websites, attend the writer’s groups and conferences, yet we’re still left scratching our heads in bemusement as to if we’re creating our work the “right” way.

Maybe that’s the problem—we’re so focused on turning out the perfect manuscript and getting published that we’ve lost focus of the true purpose of potential books: to tell our stories.

Some writers tend to think in order to “sell” their work, they must dash out something that’s the current “trend,” but once the market is saturated with a specific genre, your work will remain on the slush pile for an undetermined amount of time.

Write what you know, not what’s “in style.” There’s a story that’s run through your subconscious for months (or years, if you will), characters yearning to be created and developed. Why not share them with the world? Who cares if they aren’t the “current trend?” It’s your work in progress; make it your creation!

There’s no guarantee that your work will get noticed by a publishing house sooner, but it won’t be competing with thousands of other stories with the same theme. Sometimes, it’s good to write a novel about a subject that isn’t trendy or cool, but at the same time, can grab a reader’s attention and tell an amazing story from the first chapter to the final sentence of the last page.

Pay attention to advice and feedback, but don’t take all of it literally. Otherwise, you’ll drive yourself into a frenzy and just become frustrated. Try incorporating a few of those suggestions into your work. If the ideas improve your manuscript, by all means, use them. If not, it’s fine in some cases to skip suggestions.

Yes, novels are written for readers to enjoy and take them away from the world’s woes, but at the same time, it’s also good to bring something to the market that is original and exciting. Who knows, your book could begin the next big trend, but  not if you don’t take risks and bring your own voice and excitement into the mix. I’ll see you soon on the book shelves and Kindle!

L. Anne Carrington is the author of The Cruiserweight. More by L. Anne Carrington can be found on her blog.

Guest Blog: The DNA of Writers by Janice Ivy

The other night my daughter and I were watching a movie. Another daughter came in and stood in front of us, pointing at her side, she said, “Where exactly could a person be shot in this area without it hitting any vital organs?” Daughter number one and I gave this some consideration and then we all discussed the placement of organs and the best place for a person to be shot and not suffer any permanent damage. Daughter number two went back to her room and number one and I continued watching the movie. It wasn’t until later that it occurred to me how this conversation would have been viewed by most people. It would have seemed a little odd for sure.

We’re not a family of psychopaths, just a family of writers. Three out of four of my daughters are writers. They learned from a young age that a bad grade in science or math could be quickly forgotten if they made a good grade on a paper that they had written. Should I have done that? No! Not at all. Science and math are important. But writing, writing is life! What can I say? I’ve always loved to write.

I sometimes feel a little disconnected from the real world because I am watching people and listening to them, not because I’m interested in them, but because I am seeing them as possible characters in a book. I lose track of conversations because I’m trying to think of exactly how you would spell a word to give it the exact inflection that the person speaking does.

When I’m looking at a beautiful sunset, I’m enjoying it, but I’m also describing it in my head. Is the purple more violet or lavender? Is the sun the color of an orange Popsicle or more like the yolk of a sunny side up egg?

I think maybe there’s a gene that makes people want to write. I think that same gene also makes them just a little bit crazy. I’ve never met a writer who wasn’t just a tad bit off. They don’t just march to a different drummer—they have a whole orchestra made up of dozens of wild characters playing a tune that leads them merrily along.

The next time you’re standing in a line, look at the people around you. Is there someone standing there with a far-a-way look in their eyes? Do they look just a little perplexed, like they’re trying to figure out the meaning of life? It’s probably just a writer writing the scene into his book, maybe trying to decide how to write the dialogue that he’s listening to. Watch out if he focuses on you…you could become a serial killer or a worse yet a victim in his next book.

Janice Ivy is the author of ‘Taking out the Trailer Trash‘ and a excellent Writer’s Tag contributor.

Guest Blog by Robert Dean: If I can’t keep my head out of the water, the sharks will get me

July 4th 2K10

It’s my best friend’s birthday and I’m using my girlfriend’s laptop.

Even though it’s still a mac, it doesn’t feel like mine. It’s not mine. The keys are different, the something, is different. Something is wrong. Something feels odd. Lately, everything has felt odd in my life. Lately, every night is spent tossing and turning with wonderment and a side of regret. I think in a lot of ways it’s my emotional state. Something always comes back to something.

The other day I felt so sure of myself, so, on top of my game that I felt I had nailed it, I had finally made a statement in life and someone on my dream list of agents would come to me with that phone call we’ve all been waiting for and say, “let’s do it. Me and you, we’re a team and we’re going to change the world with this motherfucker.” and what? I get rejected, again. Again. I get it, I understand that rejection makes you work harder and humble. Rejection makes you a better you and no one will be able to touch you after you know heartache some kind of twisted Bob Dylan logic. Ok, it makes sense.

Trust me, I get it. But, where do we go from here? I’m not asking for Twilight’s money, I’m asking for a shot. A legitimate shot at the people. I want to see my words in bold face print with someone’s blurb adding to the idea that is my art.

Where I am now? I’m sitting in the dark post best friend drinking session with a small blow up with my girlfriend and that idea that I want so bad isn’t happening. I’m miserable. I’m all kinds of miserable in all colors, shapes and sizes. Is it my job that makes me feel like I do? Absolutely not.

I have a great job with two of the best bosses a person could ask for.

It’s my drive as person.

It’s my living coffin. I write these posts with one thing in mind: exorcism. I want to clear my head and I want someone to see me with the goalie mask off and see how bad I want it vs the idea I project.

I scour my mind to explain myself. Some who read my blogs agree, most decide to twitter elsewhere or care about a Lohan dress malfunction but, whatever, I gotta keep the hustle alive.

What else can I do? Every day I wake up and wonder what’s the difference between being terminally ill, knowing you’re a a failure or being a perfectly living person and working their ass off to be the guy on top but to no result? Where do you go? You could blow your brains out ala O’toole and hope someone realizes your version of “Confederacy of dunces” is as good as his was or you wake up and toil in the real world and hope, letter after fucking letter or email, that someone with pull, anyone, will see you for person you are, the person will not die. The person who gives the finger back to its own reflection.

If I can’t keep my head out of the water, the sharks will get me.

Robert Dean is a freelance writer, author and poet from New Orleans, LA. He is the author of In the arms of nightmares on Slush Pile Reader.

Guest Blog by Malcolm Thomson: Writing, reading, publishing, …

Ian Roberts Guest Blog titled The Difficulties Of Becoming Published made grim reading.

Not that he fails to quote some words of encouragement…

“Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not: nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not: unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not: the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone can assure success. Press on!”.

But I wonder in what direction we should press on?

Could it be that we lovers of words-on-paper must find the courage to come out of our comfort zones and ask some questions… about publishing… and about storytelling.

Roberts invites us implicitly to do so. He points out that these big [publishing] organisations have many established writers on their books and do not need to rely on fresh talent or first-time authors.”

How true. And it is not entirely a bad thing. As a reader of on average two trade paperbacks per week I am happy that there are the established writers I can count on to craft a good yarn. Many of these are authors who have developed a franchise over the years, with their series of novels becoming almost a form of episodic entertainment, cleverly promoted as such. I do look forward to ‘the next Ian Rankin’ or a new title from Kate Mosse, Lee Child or Diana (we all have our weaknesses) Gabaldon.

None of the big publishing houses are waiting for Ian’s manuscript or mine! In the United Kingdom over fifty percent of revenues are generated by just five concerns: Harper Collins, Pan Macmillan, Penguin, Hachette and Random House. They are satisfying both their shareholders and their readers.

So the answer to the question about the publishers might well be… let them be! In many ways they have enough on their plates, given their need to adapt to the world of e-Readers and iPad apps.

The other question which could be posed concerns our understanding of storytelling.

Under the heading Publish For What Reason? Johanna Denize reminded us on this blog that change is slow, especially when it comes to an existing giant of an industry that has been run the same way basically since Gutenberg came along.”

But it could be argued that the Internet and a range of digital tools now provide a totally new toolset, in itself as revolutionary as Gutenberg’s press was in its time and as likely to bring about as radical and irreversible change as the advent of printing did. The scriptoria emptied! My comment to the blog post was as follows…

I am wondering whether we are overlooking one of the most significant points with regard to narrative fiction and electronic interface devices. What I spy on the horizon is a move towards transmediality. I look forward to storytelling as compelling as any successful novel, but delivered not just as written prose, but in multiple forms on multiple platforms.”

I made a tentative step in this direction about four years ago. I had thirty-nine chapters of a manuscript and the vague notion that a website-based hybrid form of self-publishing was… thinkable. Sex&Drugs&Profiteroles The idea was to release a chapter per week as an audio podcast hosted on what seemed at the time to be the most promising platform. The first thirteen chapters were to be free, but a one-time payment would be asked for from those wishing to carry on to the end.

Each audio chapter, however, was preceded by a short video clip, a vlog in which the novel’s heroine looks back on the events that the story relates.

Each weekly clip then closes with a call to action inciting the user to click through to the audio. The additional effort involved was far from onerous nor was it particularly demanding in terms of video skills which, in this day and age, are no longer exotic or unduly challenging. Basic editing is now possible on the latest iPhone.

In the case of my own project we didn’t get further than Chapter Seven. But this was not on account of any basic flaw in the operational model. There was a hiccup when a particular software suite, permitting videoblogging with virtual green-screen backgrounds, was suddenly withdrawn from the market when Adobe bought the company. When the product (Visual Communicator, US$ 399) was re-launched it was too late for us.

The main problem at the time was that I was working in Abu Dhabi and my ‘heroine’ was at university in England; our only direct collaboration was for the sixth and seventh chapters which were coveniently locationed in Dubai. And our realization was that a venture of this nature is totally not made easier when thousands of kilometres lie between the participating creatives.

I remain convinced that the video component enhanced the potential discoverability of Sex&Drugs&Profiteroles. And in 2006 YouTube was by no means as powerful a force as it is today. A story that is difficult to find is a story which will never be read; this being a problem that few of the self-publishing enablers have adequately solved.

Today the transmediality can go further than video. An interactive game, features akin to the ‘bonus content’ we know from DVDs, social network community involvement, virtual presence in a metaverse like SecondLife

Ian Roberts recalls a writing course which “taught me to ‘throw away’ every word that was not essential and to focus on the story and the characters, not my self-indulgent descriptions and unnecessary narrative.” Many writers follow this brutal and soulless rule and even get their work published. My feeling is that their readers are the kind who mistake Fox News for journalism!

At the risk of provoking I would suggest that Ian’s self-indulgent descriptions and unnecessary narrative constitute, for a sophisticated audience open to the enrichment of a Gesamtkunstwerk, exactly the kind of resource which can be further developed as cross-platform extensions of storytelling. The motion picture Artificial Intelligence and the television series Alias and, more recently, Lost show the way. In these cases the total entertainment experience went far beyond the flickering imagery on the screen with immersive websites which attracted the active engagement of a participating audience.

None of the platform extensions a novelist might be tempted (I hope) to try imply any huge hardware or software investment, none demand skills which cannot be quickly learned. And all of these and more can move storytelling from mere words-on-paper to a new level, and one on which the independents and newcomers are probably better positioned than the publishing behemoths of old.

The thinking behind the trend in the direction of transmediality is far better expressed by others far more qualified than I. Might I recommend particularly Henry Jenkins, Provost’s Professor of Communication, Journalism, and Cinematic Arts at the University of Southern California. In Convergence Culture Jenkins cites the Matrix as an example of transmedia storytelling. Jenkins explains that key bits of information are conveyed through three live action films, a series of animated shorts, two collections of comic book stories, and several video games. There is no one single source or ur-text where one can turn to gain all of the information needed to comprehend the Matrix universe.”

A Wiki page lists further links which will prove useful to those wishing to dip a toe into these fascinating waters.

Slush Pile Reader is, of course, for storytellers who are first and foremost writers. But as we authors, chastened as we must be by Ian Roberts’ well-intentioned

reflections, look ahead and realize that the chances of our tale being published between hard covers is truly remote, I think that the consideration of alternatives is probably a damn good idea.

Malcolm James Thomson is the author of Golden Dawn and blogs from, of all the interesting places out there,  Abu Dhabi, on Sandlander.

If you too want to be a guest blogger – send us a message: johanna@slushpilereader.com

Guest blog by L. Anne Carrington: Why do we write?

Why do we write? Is there a story that needs to be told, but yet not put down on paper? Do some of us aim to produce the next Great American Novel? Maybe we have a message that writing is an effective way to reach large groups of people, or perhaps it’s our own form of therapy (why do you think some psychotherapists encourage their patients to journal on a regular basis?)

Some love to write for fun, yet get paid at the same time, others only write one book just to say they’ve done it (maybe as part of a lifetime goal), and then there’s a handful of people who write for the sole purpose of earning income—they despise writing in general.

There’s a book in our heads waiting to be written, characters brought to life and shared with the world. Like painting, sketching, and sculpture, writing’s an art that creates a story with words rather than pencil, charcoal, paint, or clay.

When we’ve completed a book or story, a feeling of accomplishment and elation often felt, especially if months—and in many cases, years— were invested in writing, editing, and developing a book previously stored in our subconscious before coming to life, whether on pages or electronic readers.

There are authors exploring new subjects not previously tapped, others jumping on the latest trend, and yet more trying something original on their own. All the aforementioned may be instant hits or may fail on the market (given if the works get published), but one isn’t a writer if risks aren’t taken once in awhile.

Writing can be a hobby, a job, or something else altogether. During my early years, I wasn’t a person who could communicate feelings and thoughts well in the verbal sense, but hand me a notebook and pen (followed in later years by a typewriter, and then a PC with a word processing program), and I could express myself without thinking. At the age of eighteen, while I worked on my high school’s newspaper, I became enamored with writing on the journalistic level, and was the first staff member to be published in a major paper after, on a whim, I submitted a music review to one of the city’s newspapers.

Encouraged, I began producing other written work over the next several years, many published in both print and various websites, working my way up to The Wrestling Babe internet column in 2003, and a two-year stint as a music reviewer for Indie Music Stop. In between, I did “fun” writing, such as fan fiction, as a stress reliever, and in July 2008, I decided to push the envelope further by starting my first full-length novel, The Cruiserweight.

Like any other vocation or interest in the world, writing has its down side. We experience things such as writer’s block, rejection letters, naysayers who say that we can’t do it and are wasting our time, endless hours of editing, thinking of new ways to come up with marketing our works, and finding honest, yet constructive, critiques.

Still, we continue to write…but why? Because we can, and despite the drawbacks of our hobby (or vocation, whatever the case), we enjoy the challenges and the creative aspects writing brings, and the feelings of fulfillment and elation once a project’s completed and in print makes the entire journey of being a writer worthwhile…then we start all over again.

–L. Anne Carrington

L. Anne Carrington is the author of The Cruiserweight cc she also has her own excellent blog.

Guest Blog by Ian Roberts: The Difficulties of Becoming Published

A long time ago, I wrote a novel. It took me a year to write it, and I then sent it off expecting a quick reply, a fat cheque and early retirement. What I got instead was a stream of rejection slips, other than two letters, which showed interest and offered encouragement. One was from an agent, who showed great interest, the other from the fiction editor of a large publisher, which has now been swallowed up by a multinational conglomerate. I was invited to rewrite the novel, making specified changes, and resubmit it. I did this. It took me another year, in between renovating a house, teaching English, playing rugby and getting married. I sent off the rewritten version, expecting more speedy replies and an even fatter check. Instead, after quite some time, I received two polite letters. The first one informed me that the agent had died a month earlier and that the agency was dealing with her affairs and unable to take on new clients. The second letter told me that the editor in question had left publishing. I was just a little disappointed and said things such as ‘Oh gosh’ and ‘Dearie me’, as I flung the unread, returned typescripts across the room. I then rushed out of the house and assaulted a man who happened to be walking his dog. For good measure, I kicked the dog too. Ten years later, in between playing rugby, renovating another house, being married, teaching and becoming a father, I rewrote the book, again with no success. Sadly, I couldn’t find an old man or a dog to assault, so I shot the neighbour’s cat instead.

This book would not let go of me, so I decided to have another go, this time with a difference. To try and make a little extra money, I had tried my hand at short stories, after trying a writing course. I won’t go into all the details, but the course taught me to ‘throw away’ every word that was not essential and to focus on the story and the characters, not my self-indulgent descriptions and unnecessary narrative. As a result, my novel was completed at half the original length. It was self-published (paid for by a friend, who had faith in it), in 2006, and sold quite well with family and friends (I made the huge amount of approx £200.00). I have also had five short stories accepted for publication. So, there you go: to get this far, it has taken a couple of decades (on and off), a badly-beaten man and his dog and a dead cat. I thought I would tell you this just to cheer you up and fill you with optimism from the outset.

The first thing you should know is that becoming published is extremely difficult. And that is an understatement, even for those who are talented enough and have a potential best seller to offer. If you are not prepared for a very long ride and to accept one rejection after another, forget the idea. You might become one of the lucky few and quickly find a publisher or agent to take you on. But, for most aspiring writers, it is a very long and rocky road. Becoming published demands talent, accepting good advice, working on the craft of story-telling, a lot of patience, hard work and determination. It also demands a willingness to accept the letters of rejection time and again then pick yourself up and start all over. It’s not easy. Consider this. You have put in a great deal of work. You have slaved over your typescript and you believe it is going to happen for you. You really believe that your hopes and dreams will soon be a reality. You have sweated over that typescript for months or years. You believe in it. You ache to be recognised as a writer. You think it is a worthy piece of writing. Then, the postman delivers that first rejection letter, and many more follow. You receive one letter after another telling you that your work is not wanted or good enough. It is heart breaking, a terrible feeling of disbelief and hurt. How can they say that you ask. I’ve worked so hard. They can’t do this to me. And the rejection letters rarely offer worthwhile encouragement or advice. I have been there, and it hurts. It knocks the wind from your sails, and you really have to want writing success to face these slings and arrows and keep on going. If you think you might not be able to face that then forget about being published right now. Have I cheered you up even more or do you feel like shooting a cat?

There are too many examples to quote of successful authors who were initially rejected by numerous publishers and agents. There are thousands of them. You may be aware of James Patterson, currently a very popular author of a string of best crime and mystery novels, several of which have been made into films. His first book, The Thomas Berryman Number, was rejected twenty-four times before being published, but it went on to win the prestigious Edgar Award for a first mystery novel. Another author, John Kennedy Toole, provides a very poignant, example. Toole killed himself in 1969, because he could not get his book published. His mother persisted with the typescript, which was eventually published as A Confederacy of Dunces, a wonderful book, which subsequently won the Pulitzer Prize and was translated into ten languages. I imagine few people have not heard of a certain JK Rowling. Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone was not her first novel. She had written and put aside two novels before beginning the Harry Potter series. The Philosopher’s Stone itself took years to write and was rejected numerous times before publication. These are just a few examples, and I will provide some more, later. There are many successful authors, past and present, who have had frequent experience of rejection. The keyword is ‘perseverance’: if you are good enough and want it enough, you may succeed, but it is not easy. Or, hard as it may be to accept, you may not have what it takes and must face that reality. But if you are good enough and want it enough and persevere you could get there.

On Persistence: “Nothing in the world can take the place of Persistence. Talent will not: nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not: unrewarded Genius is almost a proverb. Education will not: the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone can assure success. Press on!”

(Anonymous)

Publishers and authors’ agents receive hundreds of typescripts or manuscripts each week and are inundated with work from unknown writers as well as work from established authors or writing that has been specially commissioned. The competition is very fierce, and even established authors can be rejected. An editorial assistant or professional ‘reader’ may determine how far your work gets, and it may depend on personal preference or simply a whim. Even if your work reaches the desk of an editor who thinks you have potential, it may not be his decision to accept or reject your work. You may have produced writing of merit, brilliance, even, but that does not guarantee publication. In days gone by, publishing houses might well accept work of merit and publish it for little or no profit, in the knowledge that the work was good and may possibly lead to bigger things. However, the days of ‘gentleman publishing’ are gone, and accountants now rule the roost. Many of the old publishing houses have disappeared, replaced by conglomerates and multinationals whose sole motivation is profit. These big organisations have many established writers on their books and do not need to rely on fresh talent or first-time authors. The criteria for publication are ‘will it sell and to whom and how many copies’. It does not matter if you have talent or potential worth nurturing. If you can not turn an immediate profit you will probably face rejection, unless you are lucky, for luck as well as talent and perseverance play a big part in becoming published unless, of course, you ‘know’ someone, and even then there are no guarantees. It is, in a way, comparable to The X-Factor, on TV. There are thousands of applicants, a great deal of talent on display, more than a few sad people with little self-knowledge or ability, many broken hearts and only a small number who actually make it. Such is life, but remember that every winner of the Booker Prize, Pulitzer Prize or even Nobel Prize was once an unpublished writer. Writers write and keep on going. So, do you still want to be a writer?

Dealing with rejection: remember that both past and currently successful authors, many of them now household names, once faced rejection. John Braine, one of the literary ‘names’ of the last century, had Room at the Top rejected thirty-eight times. It is now regarded as a classic of that genre. Jack Higgins, who wrote The Eagle Has Landed and a stream of best sellers, struggled for years to become published. Wilbur Smith, Stephen King, even Charles Dickens: the list is endless, and rejection is the norm, not the exception. A rather scary piece of information is that there are probably more writers than readers out there.

However, although a rejection letter or slip will hurt you, it is not the end unless you allow it to be. Think back to the earlier examples of rejected writers who achieved success and fame. Here are some more: “You’re welcome to Le Carre. He hasn’t got any future.” This was said about John Le Carre’s book The Spy Who Came In From the Cold. I wonder how many million books John Le Carre has now sold. “A long, dull novel about an artist.” This was a comment on Irving Stone’s biographical novel of the life of Van Gogh, which sold a million and was made into a film. So, it’s not all gloom and doom, but keep that word ‘perseverance’ firmly in your head and accept that you are most probably in for a long haul if you really want to be a successful and paid writer. No one ever achieved writing success by throwing away a typescript when rejected and angry and bitter and hurt by a publisher’s adverse reaction. Keep your typescript, shoot a cat then start again. Mao Tse Tung, the father of modern China, said: “A thousand-mile journey begins with the first step…” And most aspiring writers face that metaphorical ‘thousand-mile’ journey. You have to start somewhere, but it will probably be a long walk, so be prepared or pack it in, now.

Publishers and agents will, for the most part, if rejecting you, provide a polite letter in a standardised format. They do not exist to edit or criticise your work and will refuse to do so. They are very busy with those whose work has been accepted. However, if you are lucky enough to receive a reply with more than a brief, perfunctory comment you are honoured, as publishers do not waste time with those whose work shows no merit at all. If this happens to you, despite the rejection, be encouraged, but if you receive a stream of offhand rejections you might consider whether your work is worth the effort or that writing is not for you at all. So, do you still want to be a writer?

The rewards of writing: I’m sure there are many people who would and will continue to write for no material reward, but wouldn’t it be wonderful to get paid huge amounts for a labour of love? But, I’m afraid there is more bad news for you. For most, the financial rewards are few. I’ll bet you’re glad you’re reading this, aren’t you? We sometimes read of astronomic sums paid to novelists, the sale of film rights and writers who become tax exiles. It is no wonder some people think writing is an easy way to become rich. In reality, the average author’s earnings are very small. Few can afford to make it a full time career unless they have other means of financial support. Even one successful book does not guarantee a second, and earnings may vary from year to year. You would probably need a string of best sellers to guarantee automatic acceptance of your next book or a large and steady income from writing novels. Or, you could become a glamour model, with an expensive boob job, display your goods to all and sundry in the tabloids and, after a short career of boob displays, write an utterly fascinating biography of life as a ‘celebrity’.

So, you write your novel and are fortunate enough to find a publisher. What can you expect to earn? Well, there is no hard and fast answer. Perhaps you might make that fortune or maybe you will hardly cover your expenses. You may receive an advance from your publisher, but the amount will depend on the number of future sales your publisher envisages. The greater the sales potential of your book, the larger the advance you will be paid. If sales of your book produce an amount exceeding the advance, you will then receive royalties as well, according to the contract previously negotiated. For example, if your book costs £15.00, you will have to sell one thousand copies at a royalty of 10% to earn £1,500.00, and there is no guarantee you will sell that many. Perhaps you might then receive upwards of £1000.00 for the paperback rights. This will be shared with your hardback publisher, in keeping with your contract. Foreign translation rights and public lending rights (libraries, etc) could increase the amount your book earns, as could the foreign rights, if sold. Multiply this by ten and you might have made £30,000.00 but may take several years to achieve this. And you must balance this against all the time and sweat and hopes ploughed into your book.

My own view is that it’s not about money (I won’t refuse any donations, however): it’s about the love of words and language; it’s about the excitement of creating; it’s about the freedom and fun of being able to do what the hell you want to, with characters and situations, people and places – it’s about writing.

Do you still want to be a writer? I do.

Ian Roberts loves rugby, reading and writing, as well as wine, music and film. He’s a smallholder who lives in North Wales and the author of ‘Catch the Sun‘ on Slush Pile Reader.

If you too want to be a guest blogger – send us a message: johanna@slushpilereader.com



Slush Pile Reader, the blog, is open for contributions

It just dawned on us here at Slush Pile Reader HQ that we have a site comprised of amazing writers from all walks of live and from all over the world. Basically we are sitting on a goldmine of talent. We have a teacher from Virginia, a journalist from India, homemaker from England and a college student from Alabama. We have doctors, a policeman, full time writers ad even a massage therapist, all of whom, regardless of background, share one thing – their love of reading and writing.

I don’t know about the rest of you, but I am curious about the Slush Pile Reader members. What brought you to our community, what got you started writing, what are your dreams and ambitions. Who are you?

I know many of our members have specific knowledge Some are particularly experienced and talented at editing and have an abundance of information on the subject. Others are great at developing plots, whereas some excel at typecasting or scenery. Others are English teachers with an astounding knowledge of literature. Some are experts at crime writing others at Sci Fi. All of you have some particular talent.

So here’s my thought – wouldn’t it be great to know more about your fellow Slushers? Wouldn’t you love to share their knowledge and benefit from their experience? I know I would.

This is an invitation to all Slush Pile Reader members to share your story and your expertise with the Slush Pile Reader community. The Slush Pile Reader blog is open for contributions. The subject matter is free – write what you know, what you are passionate about and want to share.

Do you want to tell us about yourself, and why you write? Do you have the chops to write a tutorial on editing, we would love to read it. Do you want to talk about the development of crime plots in the Internet era, or the Elizabethan novel, or the future of Manga, or whatever it is you love, please do! If you have a blog entry in you, write it down and email it to me. I will post them in the order they arrive. I can’t wait to see what you got.

A few weeks back Karen Bessey Peace, one of the most prolific members of the site and longtime contributor to the Writers’ Tag wrote an excellent and much appreciated piece. When the official Writers’ Tag was launched, Eugene Saint, Writers’ Tag instigator and pro extra ordinaire, contributed with a detailed background and explanation of the Tag. So following in their footsteps, who wants to have a first go as Slush Pile Reader guest blogger?

Publish for what reason?

Well, here we go again. Once in a while, lengthy articles on the state of publishing pop up in the most reputable of magazines. Don’t get me wrong, I am all for it and the articles are great – well researched and thought provoking and much needed. The only thing is – they are kind of repetitive and, well old. What they are saying is nothing new, at least not to us, the team at Slush Pile reader, or for that matter to you, the Slush Pile Reader’s authors and readers. If it were, you wouldn’t be here, would you?

The latest article is wordy, but worth a read. It dwells a bit too much on e-books and the wonder of the iPad (What do you all think of that one?! Is it the second coming or just another fabulous marketing ploy by Jobs et al?) but it touches upon quite a few very relevant topics. The best quote I believe is the one by Tim O’Reilly, of O’Reilly Media who believes that the publisher’s model is fundamentally flawed: “Publishers never built the infrastructure to respond to customers.”. In other words, the old school publishers have forgotten one simple little thing – asking the customers what they want to read. In extension, no matter how obsolete some want to make out brick and mortar book stores to be, without them publishers wouldn’t have a clue on how to sell or to whom, since that is the only market data they have to go on. Basically publishers do no market research, have no data on their customers, and basically publish books based on nothing more than feeling and instinct, kind of like putting your finger up to the wind to see where it blows from.

The opposite of what Slush Pile Reader is all about…

Here’s the deal – everyone complains about the low margins and the decreasing profitability of publishing. Publishers do not like Amazon’s pricing and they get their knickers in a twist over it, claiming they absolutely need e-pricing to be higher since they are already losing money. How on earth can they loose money on a 9.99 e-book is beyond me? If people can make money on a snickers bar, they can make money on a virtual product that has already been vetted and produced in the off line world. E-books is just another outlet – it doesn’t entail greater costs. The reality is – it is not pricing that is flawed but costs. It is possible to lower costs (fancy offices, meetings, oodles of staff…) and make the profits higher for everyone, including the author, without whom there would be no publishing industry after all (which many publishers seem to forget and often they act as if they are indeed granting authors a favor simply by gracing them with a second of their time). By selecting books based on facts, not on gut feeling or the picking of manuscripts based on who knows who and who is the best cookie pusher – but on, gasp, literary merit and what the readers actually want to read, more books would be sold; costs cut, profits increased and everyone would be merrier for it. N’est pas?

Change is slow, especially when it comes to an existing giant of an industry that has been run the same way basically since Gutenberg came along. Ignoring the way it has always been done, and sticking to ones guns is vital. Remember change seldom, if ever, comes from within an industry. E-book readers were not invented by the giants dominating publishing. With authors and readers like all of you here at Slush Pile Reader change will come from the customers themselves and finally books will be published based on merit and demand, not arbitrary reasons such as luck, nepotism and some more luck.

Writers’ Tag finds a great home at Slush Pile Reader

What is Writers’ Tag?

Writers’ Tag is a game played here at Slush Pile Reader in which individual writers collaborate to write a first draft manuscript. There are no preconceived characters or plot – they are developed as the story progresses – and there are no rules (and apparently no moral or ethical values beyond the policies of this site) to limit the scope of the story. You start by just starting. After that, each writer adds his/her entries to the story until we have a completed manuscript. That’s it. It sounds simple and it is simple – at least in theory.

The origin of Writers’ Tag lies rooted in a game known as Artists’ Tag. Predicated on the hypothetical that “Anyone who draws a dozen thumbnail sketches per day for six months will develop the skill-set required to be a professional artist”, in 1972 a handful of Fine Art majors at Key West Community College (of which I was one) began playing a game wherein we would start with a blank sheet of paper and a token object that was fairly easy to draw, say a cube or a star. The point of the game was to move the object around the page using various means. For example: Artist No.1 might draw a cannon and shoot the object to the upper corner of the page. Artist No. 2 might fly the object back across the page in a jet, where Artist No. 3 might parachute it back to the bottom of the page. It’s possible a spider could pick up the object from there and… you get the idea. The game would progress thusly until the page was full. There are no winners or losers – though some would argue there are only winners.

Everybody likes to watch artists create something where before there was nothing. It is an incredibly powerful learning experience to observe a master apply his/her trade – be they a musician showing you a new chord change or a painter with a more effective brush stroke. The same thing applies to writing. Every time one puts pen to paper it should be a learning experience for both reader and writer alike – and it should be fun. Enter: Slush Pile Reader.

After attempts to gain a foothold for Writers’ Tag at other sites – the results of which have ranged from so-so (owing to technical incompatibilities) to dismal failure (owing to administrative disinterest bordering on dissuasion) we found Slush Pile Reader. Here we’ve found a kindred spirit. The SPR Administration has been nothing but supportive of our efforts (Pascal and Johanna have actually joined in the writing) and it would take a better wordsmith than I to express our true gratitude and appreciation of their efforts — but I can tell you what’s happening now.

The two biggest challenges we’ve had are: 1.) Writers being tagged who simply don’t have the time, at that moment, to add their bit – or worse, have time to add to the story but no time to adequately absorb what’s already been written – and 2.) More than one writer writing at the same time, thereby tripping over each other.

These problems have been effectively overcome by what Daniel (The head tech dude here at Slush Pile Reader) et al have been coding for us. As of now there will be a Writers’ List to which writers may sign up to be part of a particular Tag. They’ve also added an electronic Token. Akin to the conch shell of Lord Of The Flies fame, whoever possesses the Token is responsible for adding the next entry. Those on the Writers’ List are eligible to grab the Token (thereby reserving the next entry) when they feel they have something to add to the story. So now, writers on the list for a particular Tag may grab the Token by simply clicking on it (when it’s available) then start writing. Writers’ Tag has also been given its own Heading and dedicated space on the Forum. A “Tag Master” will be assigned to each Writers’ Tag when it is started (this will also allow multiple concurrent games). The Tag Master will have Moderator’s edit capability in order to edit and update any post on their assigned Writers’ Tag thread. There are more enhancements in the planning stages too.

Why Writers’ Tag?

1. Writers’ Tag taps the creativity in each of us. You never know what scenario you’ll be faced with. To say it’s a challenge is to understate the fact. You’ll be amazed how much a single round will sharpen your writing skills – as you write your way out of the pan and into the fire. :^)

2. Writers’ Tag generates additional interest in the site. Lots of people check in just to see what’s happening with the latest Tag. You just never know what might happen next. Nobody knows – it’s not like you can Google it. As was recently observed: typically when you read a book, the rest has already been written. That’s not the case with Writers’ Tag. Not to mention, folks just naturally love serials.

3. Writers’ Tag is a vehicle for showcasing your writing style and skills. In short, if folks like your Writers’ Tag entries then there’s a good chance they’ll check out your MS. By the way, that would seem a fairly strong argument for putting some real thought into your Tags.

4. Most of all, Writers’ Tag is Fun! As the MS grows so too does the synergy of the writing group. I feel very close to the excellent writers with whom I’ve had the privilege of writing. I’ve learned a lot too and have recently had a go at things I never would have attempted in the past (I’d never written a “love scene” in my life until a couple weeks ago). So, it’s much more than just fun.

The actual nuts and bolts of the process are detailed under the Writers’ Tag Forum heading. Do yourself a favor and come check it out.

Eugene Saint